... appears to me to be a random-answer generator, as it seems to have no consistency in it at all. It's certainly not doing any reasonable textual analysis.
There's a post by the device's creator here, if you're interested, although it doesn't go into a massive amount of detail; possibly the most telling revelation is that it's only got a small number of authors whose writing style it knows, which indubitably limits its ability to make good matches.
It doesn't say anything about keywords, but several people on my friendslist are convinced that's a factor. One reports that one of his pieces of writing was initially marked as "Arthur Conan Doyle", then changed to "P. G. Wodehouse" when the only alteration he made was to rename the central character from "Holmes" to "Jeeves".
I fed three different parts of a story into it. Each part came up with a different author. Interestingly, the Alien Space Bat story came up with Mark Twain, the romance came up Douglas Adams.
It's looking at keywords. I fed it "Chrono Crusade fanfic, and it gave me Dan Brown. I fed it Kuroshitsuji/Black Jewels crossover, and it gave me Stephen King.
Jane Austen writes like Jane Austen Henry James writes like Jane Austen Nabokov writes like Nabokov Norman Maclean writes like Defoe Defoe writes like Shakespeare Howard Kurtz writes like Stephen King (well, that could have been the content) Sagan writes like Poe Poe writes like Doyle Doyle writes like Doyle
no subject
Date: 2010-07-13 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-13 11:59 pm (UTC)~T
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 12:40 am (UTC)"crucifix mountain scientist and the handsome foggy climbed archives raced"
It's all about the keywords. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 12:59 am (UTC)Perhaps I need to de-convolute my sentences some.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 01:43 am (UTC)It doesn't say anything about keywords, but several people on my friendslist are convinced that's a factor. One reports that one of his pieces of writing was initially marked as "Arthur Conan Doyle", then changed to "P. G. Wodehouse" when the only alteration he made was to rename the central character from "Holmes" to "Jeeves".
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 02:11 am (UTC)I don't write like either, by the way.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 05:03 am (UTC)Jane Austen writes like Jane Austen
Henry James writes like Jane Austen
Nabokov writes like Nabokov
Norman Maclean writes like Defoe
Defoe writes like Shakespeare
Howard Kurtz writes like Stephen King (well, that could have been the content)
Sagan writes like Poe
Poe writes like Doyle
Doyle writes like Doyle
no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 12:20 am (UTC)Being BAD at analysis is very likely.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 11:01 pm (UTC)Successive passages from the same continuous text yield insanely varying answers. The inconsistency is such that it is only even good for a joke once.
Bah and fhtagn to the lot of it!