Active Entries
- 1: FENRIR: Chapter 33
- 2: FENRIR: Chapter 32
- 3: FENRIR: Chapters 30 and 31
- 4: Project 2025: My Commentary
- 5: We Don't Want to Kill (Most) Corporations, or "Look, Just Serve Your Damn Markets!"
- 6: Did Anyone Nazi This Coming, or "Seriously, They're Not Even Pretending Anymore"
- 7: Fenrir: Chapter 20
- 8: Today's Rant, or The Other Party Needs To Stop Sucking
- 9: Color-Blind Policies Only Work If Society Is Already Colorblind, or Prejudice is Alive And Well
- 10: A More Positive Post, or Offering Solutions Not Objections!
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-03-24 01:18 am (UTC)There's a massive problem with the hypothetical as posed-- if you assume a "classical" vampire, turning requires death & burial; there's no "suddenly", there's no "no one else knows", etc. However, once you posit a nonclassical vampire (and the "crosses & religious symbols don't affect her" also moves the situation in that direction), then more information is required to outline the situation. Otherwise, it's an unfair, loaded question that's nearly on the level of "When did you stop beating your wife?"
Also, I've read both "I Am Legend" and "Interview with the Vampire", and so have ample "primary" evidence, as it were, for there being multiple acceptible ways of handling the potential for child vampires that are entirely dependent on the precise nature of the situation.