(This is not just for myself, but for all writers -- pro and especially amateur/fan writers. It does pertain to anyone who's read any of my non-commercially published stuff, though -- fanfics, gamefic, etc.)
Some writers, such as myself,
autopope, and a number of others both on LJ and elsewhere, get what might be considered the ultimate reward for writing some stories: they get published. People pay actual, green money (or swipe real, honest plastic) to obtain our material.
However, this ISN'T true of most people who write. And it isn't even true of everything the "pro" writers write. Sometimes I write stuff that isn't published and probably won't be. The vast majority of people who write, though, are unpublished. Some of these, of course, are unpublished because, well, they're bad. Many others, though, are unpublished because their material is unpublishable for one reason or another.
This does NOT mean that they are UNREAD. Many of you are readers of fanfic, of "amusement" fics, and so on. The author, however, doesn't get one red cent from those who read such fics.
The reward you get for a non-commercially published article is only one thing: appreciation by the readers. Admittedly, some authors have a really NARROW definition of "appreciation" -- one that reduces to "fulsome, uncritical praise". A good author, though, should be able to appreciate even an honest critique because it shows INTEREST. It shows that someone was willing to spend time, effort, and thought in crafting even a negative response.
So if there's someone out there whose stuff you've read and you haven't told them what you thought of it -- RESPOND! Let the author know what you thought. Because for 90% of the writers out there, it's the only reward they'll get.
Some writers, such as myself,
However, this ISN'T true of most people who write. And it isn't even true of everything the "pro" writers write. Sometimes I write stuff that isn't published and probably won't be. The vast majority of people who write, though, are unpublished. Some of these, of course, are unpublished because, well, they're bad. Many others, though, are unpublished because their material is unpublishable for one reason or another.
This does NOT mean that they are UNREAD. Many of you are readers of fanfic, of "amusement" fics, and so on. The author, however, doesn't get one red cent from those who read such fics.
The reward you get for a non-commercially published article is only one thing: appreciation by the readers. Admittedly, some authors have a really NARROW definition of "appreciation" -- one that reduces to "fulsome, uncritical praise". A good author, though, should be able to appreciate even an honest critique because it shows INTEREST. It shows that someone was willing to spend time, effort, and thought in crafting even a negative response.
So if there's someone out there whose stuff you've read and you haven't told them what you thought of it -- RESPOND! Let the author know what you thought. Because for 90% of the writers out there, it's the only reward they'll get.
Responding to myself...
Date: 2005-10-25 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-25 03:55 pm (UTC)Yes. yes you should.
Date: 2005-10-25 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-25 05:52 pm (UTC)PS: I did like both Digital Knight and Mountain Magic and have every intention of snapping up the eArc of Boundary once I can.
snerk
Date: 2005-10-25 06:04 pm (UTC)I've read it seven times. :)
Re: snerk
Date: 2005-10-25 06:45 pm (UTC)Well, okay, YOU can taunt them. A little. But remember to do so in moderation.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-25 06:47 pm (UTC)I stopped feedbacking non-friends because of my experiences in Harry Potter fandom. People got snippy about feedback that wasn't to their standards, which made a lot of readers feel bad and worthless.
Yeah, that's the flipside of the coin.
Date: 2005-10-25 07:34 pm (UTC)Sure, I'd love it if people wrote nothing but long, involved, positive discussions of my work... but ONLY if I believed that this was actually, sincerely, what they meant. I don't at all mind negative comments if they're above the level of "Uhhuuhuh, you SUCK, dood.". Some things I know I WON'T be good at. Sometimes I'll agree with a negative, sometimes I won't, sometimes I'll agree but say "but I don't care", but I try NOT to discourage any kind of sincere commentary.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-25 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-28 03:40 am (UTC)Re: snerk
Date: 2005-10-28 06:53 pm (UTC)It will give me something other to do than writing while I wait for a reply on the one Pam forwarded to Jim's inbox. (Yes, just knowing I got that far was another boost). Who knows, maybe I can talk someone into reading it six times?
Re: Yeah, that's the flipside of the coin.
Date: 2005-10-28 06:59 pm (UTC)No.
Date: 2005-10-28 07:55 pm (UTC)