Date: 2006-03-31 12:22 am (UTC)
Meh.

I'm sorry, Wasp, but meh.

Once again, you've taken something that was good and simple and fun (and meant to be that way by the creator, IMO) and added another layer of complication... why? To show everyone how clever you are by twisting the facts to support an entirely different conclusion? Because complexity itself is beautiful (fractals, nebulae, microscopic vistas), and therefore More Complexity is Always Good? Because you proceed from the assumption that people are manipulative and dishonest?

I'm not buying it, just like I didn't buy your last pet theory. Lucas may have stumbled as a storyteller, but I think it's pretty clear what story he was trying to tell. Same here with Bird.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 08:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios