Active Entries
- 1: FENRIR: Chapter 33
- 2: FENRIR: Chapter 32
- 3: FENRIR: Chapters 30 and 31
- 4: Project 2025: My Commentary
- 5: We Don't Want to Kill (Most) Corporations, or "Look, Just Serve Your Damn Markets!"
- 6: Did Anyone Nazi This Coming, or "Seriously, They're Not Even Pretending Anymore"
- 7: Fenrir: Chapter 20
- 8: Today's Rant, or The Other Party Needs To Stop Sucking
- 9: Color-Blind Policies Only Work If Society Is Already Colorblind, or Prejudice is Alive And Well
- 10: A More Positive Post, or Offering Solutions Not Objections!
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2025-05-11 08:44 am (UTC)Contrarian point:
Habeas Corpus was never part of Scottish Law (it was very much an English thing) but Scotland found a way to achieve the same results (no suspension of due process) regardless.
And Habeas Corpus is no longer part of English law either: the very last vestiges of it were wound up in 1998 when the Human Rights Act came into force (which is a part of Scottish Law), which implements the European Convention of Human Rights in the English and Scottish legal systems at a constitutional level.
TLDR: you can have a justice system that works without Habeas Corpus.
So Habeas Corpus is to some extent a shibboleth these days. It is, however, very concerning that a nazi-adjacent MAGA is calling for its suspension, because it is a (increasingly antiquated) part of US law and he's not proposing to replace it with anything except the Will of the Führer.