Some rambling thoughts...
Oct. 25th, 2008 06:01 pmYou know what's really great but I can't find anywhere? GINGER Altoids. Found them once a few months ago in, I think, an airport, and never seen them before or since. But they were great.
HOW THE HELL do you make barbeque, etc., potato chips? It's not just figuring out the right spice mixture (though obviously that's a major trick -- it's not just spices but some kind of sweetener, maybe something like cornstarch, what?), there's some trick to making the chips themselves and getting the stuff to STICK.
I think "Speed Racer" is the second movie I've really liked that TOTALLY bombed (as in, didn't even come CLOSE to making its money back at the box office. The first -- which beats it hands-down in Total Bombery -- was Cutthroat Island, which IIRC cost about $120M to make, and earned $18M at the box office. (I think Speed Racer cost about the same and it earned I think $40+M, so in adjusted dollars it cost less and made back more)
Secondhand smoke: Are there actually studies proving it's bad that were done by disinterested parties? I've run into someone claiming there aren't.
Why exactly do we get "bags" under our eyes?
I am known for being an anime fan, so it sorta makes sense that I get Japanese spam, but why the hell am I suddenly getting Russian spam?
I love aspects of current video games, but I wish I could WRITE some that work the way I know they could. Alas, this would require an army of programmers and artists.
HOW THE HELL do you make barbeque, etc., potato chips? It's not just figuring out the right spice mixture (though obviously that's a major trick -- it's not just spices but some kind of sweetener, maybe something like cornstarch, what?), there's some trick to making the chips themselves and getting the stuff to STICK.
I think "Speed Racer" is the second movie I've really liked that TOTALLY bombed (as in, didn't even come CLOSE to making its money back at the box office. The first -- which beats it hands-down in Total Bombery -- was Cutthroat Island, which IIRC cost about $120M to make, and earned $18M at the box office. (I think Speed Racer cost about the same and it earned I think $40+M, so in adjusted dollars it cost less and made back more)
Secondhand smoke: Are there actually studies proving it's bad that were done by disinterested parties? I've run into someone claiming there aren't.
Why exactly do we get "bags" under our eyes?
I am known for being an anime fan, so it sorta makes sense that I get Japanese spam, but why the hell am I suddenly getting Russian spam?
I love aspects of current video games, but I wish I could WRITE some that work the way I know they could. Alas, this would require an army of programmers and artists.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-25 11:19 pm (UTC)2. BBQ chips? well besides buying/ordering them, maybe check for those popcorn seasonings? that way you already get the dust and maybe use a ripple chip to hold all the dust when you toss them
3. i think you are the first person i know who actually liked Speed Racer hehe. what did you like about it?
4. um no idea :P
5. this is what they say
6. lol no idea, but at least its not readable
7. you and my hubby should get together. along with all those programmers and artists. so many games. so many things to fix!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-25 11:52 pm (UTC)As to wishing to write games but requiring an army of programmers and artist, well, welcome to the rather large lodge, brother. :)
-- Steve rather enjoyed Baron Munchausen when it came out, which alas also bombed at the box office ($46M to make, $8M total box office)... though that was sabotaged, apparently, by a change in the production studio. Possibly deliberately, though that may be conspiracy theorist woo.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-25 11:53 pm (UTC)Remember, the whole *point* of spam is that you don't need to target your audience just send to any email address you can find.
RE Speed Racer...
Date: 2008-10-26 12:00 am (UTC)I think I say it all in my Amazon Review of Speed Racer.
Note that Amazon as 145 reviews of Speed Racer and the total ranking is 4 stars.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 12:10 am (UTC)I also get spam from alternate worlds in which English has evolved differently.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 01:58 am (UTC)6. I get lots of portuguese spam for some odd reason.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 05:43 am (UTC)I bet that when the chips are still hot, their surface is relatively sticky, and thus will hold onto stuff sprinkled on them.
I liked both Cutthroat Island and The Long Kiss Goodnight. I think both did poorly at the box office.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 06:11 am (UTC)Well, what's a "disinterested party"? Anyone who's doing a study will be funded for that study, and if you don't consider a university researcher funded by NIH (for example) to be disinterested, then you'll have a hard time finding any. But I shall assume sanity here.
Given that assumption, it's not hard to track down an answer. Google quickly provides some reports produced by governmental agencies: U.S. EPA, the U.S. Surgeon General, California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, and World Health Organization. These are presumably "interested" parties, but these are also not studies as such -- they are reviews of studies, considering the scientific literature and drawing conclusions. Thus, they cite references, which is the key data here. I started with the WHO article, since it was the smallest PDF; it has well more than a hundred references, most of which are studies of one sort or another. Picking one (reference 51) that the text considers particularly significant and chasing it down finds that the primary author is employed at the University of Louisiana Medical Center, which I think is as close as one can plausibly get to a disinterested party. And there are dozens more of these, cited by this one report alone.
(Meanwhile, who exactly are the "interested" parties you think are going to be doing the studies? The EPA and so forth don't do scientific research; they review research done by other people to make their judgements.)
smoking second hands (aren't they hard to light?)
Date: 2008-10-26 06:16 am (UTC)I haven't come across any, though I have come across an Italian "disinterested party" study on the effects of red bell pepper use in smokers...
Those in the study who regularly ate red bell peppers had a vastly lower occurrence of the problems usually associated with smoking (lung cancer, emphysema, etc) than those who did not partake (red bell peppers are the #1 highest naturally occurring source of vitamin A - smoking causes vitamin A deficiency).
I would assume that the same works for second-hand as well.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 06:19 am (UTC)(Disclaimer: My wife works for Annual Reviews; I am not disinterested in recommending them. But, because of that, I happen to know that the articles this journal publishes are all invited submissions, not unsolicited submissions as with most scientific journals. Thus, I can pretty safely say the authors of this article were the experts on the topic at the time.)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 06:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 04:48 pm (UTC)Re: RE Speed Racer...
Date: 2008-10-26 07:14 pm (UTC)It was fun. It was ridiculous and campy and fun, and it adamantly refused to mock its source material. (Tease, yes; mock, no.) It's much the same reason I liked Kung Fu Panda.
I'll admit to being torn between admiring the movie for actually going to the trouble of having a plot which explains why the bad guys can only be defeated by winning a series of races, and being impatient that they were spending so much time on the plot when they should just be getting back to the racing already because who watches Speed Racer for the plot?
But that's a quibble. Mostly it was fun.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 07:33 pm (UTC)Amazon had ginger altoids, expect them on Wednesday.
Re: RE Speed Racer...
Date: 2008-10-26 08:36 pm (UTC)The "not mock" is the key to me. It's also why I loved Galaxy Quest despite normally hating parodies. It clearly understood WHY Old Trek was still beloved by so many people -- and understood that MOCKING that love, even if it seemed silly to others, would be directly attacking the primary demographic at which the movie was aimed.
I admire the movie for the worldbuilding. You NEEDED that to make it work as a movie -- and work it did.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 08:49 pm (UTC)I think another part is the perception and embarrassment threshold for the average viewer. Regular comics have gotten some "street cred" in the movies from things like Spider-Man, Batman, X-men, etc., but even with the anime boom, Speed Racer is an anomaly -- old, mostly forgotten except in parodies, etc., -- and even most anime fans regard it as "before my time". The nostalgia factor is for a relatively small niche. (I suspect the Wachowski(sp?) brothers basically did the same thing with Speed Racer that Eric Flint did with his Philosophical Strangler/Joe's World books: "Look, we make you tons of money, this one might flop but we REALLY want to make it, and make it right, give us this.")
SQEEE! on the Altoids.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 08:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 01:22 am (UTC)I think I've only ever seen the first ten minutes or so of Cutthroat Island, but my recollection is that based on that it was either going to be a terribly fun romp or just flat-out terrible, with not much option of anything in between.
On the other hand, I liked the recent CG Clone Wars movie, and as near as I can tell I'm the only one who did.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 04:04 pm (UTC)Cutthroat Island was a fun romp. It couldn't compare with PotC, though.
I have not seen the Clone Wars movie. The TV animated shorts were great, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-28 12:16 am (UTC)Clone Wars... the movie was the pilot for the new TV series, which is running now on Cartoon Network. The movie/new series are 3D rendered animation, unlike the first Clone Wars series which was 2D. Unfortunately the new stuff is CG on a TV budget, so for an audience that's been spoiled by Pixar feature films it can look pretty crude. Also, they made what I consider a questionable decision to try to imitate the 2D Genndy Tartakovsky character designs in 3D, and the result is... odd.
On the plus side, it's having a good time playing in the Star Wars universe, and Anakin gets a spunky teenage girl padawan sidekick, and what's not to like about that?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-28 07:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 12:38 am (UTC)Unfortunately, he didn't realize that ANGER isn't really a limited resource. Rage and fury can keep building pretty much forever. Bruce's transformation was DESIGNED, while David was an after-the-fact kludge. David absorbed powers and characteristics... but he had a limit. "You want it? Take it! TAKE IT ALL!"
And ... kaboom.
Re: RE Speed Racer...
Date: 2008-10-31 11:36 pm (UTC)The only off note was the Mach 6, which I choose to regard as a numerical typo; I consider the multi-layered punning implicit in the word "go", and the auspicious connotations of the number 5, an intrinsic part of the show's mythology.
Re: RE Speed Racer...
Date: 2008-11-04 12:39 am (UTC)I never saw any Whacky Races AFAIK, but my wife recognized a lot of the references.
One of the other things I appreciated about Speed Racer was the self-control of the actors; no matter how ridiculous things got, they portrayed their characters as seriously living in this world. (I mean, really. Opening a door and saying "Inspector Detector." with a straight face has to be a major achievement in acting)
And how can you go wrong with a movie that has lines like:
"My god, was that a ninja?"
"More like a non-ja. Terrible what passes for ninjas these days."