Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Resolving the Paradox of the Bad Dog
- 2: Another AI Post -- on Assumptions and the Future
- 3: "Traditional Publishing" -- what I expect when I hear that.
- 4: The Duty of a Civilization and Weaponized Naivete
- 5: What current AI should, and should not, be used for -- ideal and realistic
- 6: AI, Testing, and Intelligence
- 7: Elon is right, and also very wrong.
- 8: The Straw Hats are not "conservatives".
- 9: I don't pray...
- 10: Went to the No Kings 2 Protest
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 11:13 pm (UTC)The attraction I suppose comes from the combination of a deep and complex world, believable characters, and a very interesting plotline.
The problem with the current (second) FMA series (Fullmetal Alchemist:Brotherhood) is that it sort of fast-forwards through the first several months to a year of story events. The reason for this is that the FIRST series (just called Fullmetal Alchemist) was based on the same manga up to a certain point, so the first series tells that part -- mostly unchanged -- in detail, and presumably the producers of the second series didn't want to spend 26 episodes re-doing the first series with only minor tweaks.
The second series is doing the story in the manga from start to finish, because the manga is ALMOST finished now. The first series couldn't have done that, as the writer wasn't even halfway finished. What this means is that the first series diverges from the manga and ends up telling a very good alternate story which is completely different from the manga.
Overall, I think both are very good.
I particularly like certain characters and events. The main characters Ed and Al are good, of course, but often the secondary characters steal the show.
There are references to FMA in my writing, most significantly in _Threshold_; the Captain of the Odin, General Hohenheim, is named after the character who is Ed and Al's father, and looks very much like him.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-30 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-30 08:52 pm (UTC)What are you talking about, specifically? I can't think of vast scads of unnecessary filler. Well, technically the entire series is "unnecessary". But I can't think of "vast scads" of stuff I'd cut from the first series, unlike -- say -- Dragonball Z or Naruto or Saint Seiya.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 07:31 am (UTC)But they did pad out the manga storyline a lot, in addition to rearranging some of it.
(One example: Al's angst after Barry plays on his insecurities lasts, what, five episodes in the first anime?! It's barely a single chapter in the manga before Ed and Winry snap him out of it!)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 11:45 pm (UTC)The spinoff novels are considered canon by The Cow herself, and so that's not filler.
I can think of only about 2 episodes that really qualify as "unnecessary filler", in the sense that they are (A) not taken from the manga or other sources that the author created, and (B) serve no purpose in the plot. One is the Psyren episode, which AFAICT did nothing to advance the plot OR develop the characters in a meaningful way. The other is actually a couple half-episodes, where they took up a large section of the episode with something irrelevant (the Roy VS Ed duel).
no subject
Date: 2010-05-02 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 11:13 am (UTC)Unfortunately it is dead tree version, I will need to work out where the bateries belong.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 12:04 pm (UTC)