... just got my very first anonymous insulting letter. Actually, it was a certificate making me "Asshole of the Month" or something like that.
Can't read the postmark clearly, but it's air mailed from another country. I'm guessing it HAS to be a British Commonwealth origin because the stamp reads 74p (or something like that -- it was 70-something) and the head on it looks very like the Queen.
So someone went to some trouble to print up a certificate, spend money on an airmail stamp, and send it to me anonymously. I must say I appreciate this much more than the standard bile-spewing Email; there's no effort in that.
Can't read the postmark clearly, but it's air mailed from another country. I'm guessing it HAS to be a British Commonwealth origin because the stamp reads 74p (or something like that -- it was 70-something) and the head on it looks very like the Queen.
So someone went to some trouble to print up a certificate, spend money on an airmail stamp, and send it to me anonymously. I must say I appreciate this much more than the standard bile-spewing Email; there's no effort in that.
Did They Indicate What They Were Annoyed About
Date: 2011-12-02 02:45 am (UTC)Or was this just a rather involved way of going "I don't like you." as a general statement?
-- Brett
Re: Did They Indicate What They Were Annoyed About
Date: 2011-12-02 03:26 am (UTC)Re: Did They Indicate What They Were Annoyed About
Date: 2011-12-02 03:28 am (UTC)Or at least it was to one of the people involved.
-- Brett
Re: Did They Indicate What They Were Annoyed About
Date: 2011-12-02 04:45 am (UTC)It's a long time since I indulged in Philately, but I seem to recall Britain is the only country that DOESN'T put the country of origin on its stamps. Is that a clue?
BTW, I certainly didn't send it. I have no idea of your address and although I'm sure we've sparred on alt.callahans in the past I don't bear grudges.
Re: Did They Indicate What They Were Annoyed About
Date: 2011-12-02 04:50 am (UTC)I may be wrong about the term, I tossed it once I realized what it was. Could be Arsehole or maybe Sh*thead or something like that.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-02 06:27 am (UTC)You really should frame it.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-02 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-02 08:12 am (UTC)So where was the argument you think provoked your postal treasure?
no subject
Date: 2011-12-02 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-02 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-02 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-02 09:50 am (UTC)You appear to have collected a rather good one. Not an great one*, mind, but pretty good.
*A great one would have used better language to describe the depths of your (presumed) depravity. And printed it on 150gsm parchment. With gold leaf. The sort of thing that you would be proud to be insulted by and to hang on the wall.
Ok ok.But,
Date: 2011-12-03 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-03 10:49 pm (UTC)sounds like its from the uk. i know canada has loads of queen elizabeth stamps, but they say canada right across them. our P on the stamps means that they are permanently priced.
also, if you google 74p british stamp, this post is the 4th link. i couldn't find any images with google search and the royalmail site is having issues. you should save the stamp! or if you know a stamp collector, pass it their way. you may knock someones socks off.