Writer's Block: State of the Union
Jan. 20th, 2012 12:15 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[Error: unknown template qotd]
Someone who does not WANT to be President, but who will serve if called.
I think high-level politics should be very Zen. Those who wish to be president or senator or representative are not qualified, because of that desire. Those who do not wish that job, may be qualified.
Someone who does not WANT to be President, but who will serve if called.
I think high-level politics should be very Zen. Those who wish to be president or senator or representative are not qualified, because of that desire. Those who do not wish that job, may be qualified.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-21 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-21 07:00 pm (UTC)I might buy into that, but there's an old joke about a pious, devout woman preying to God to win the lottery as a reward for her piety and devotion, and becoming petulant when week after week, she doesn't win. Finally, the Lord appears and tells her, "You have to meet me halfway. Buy a lottery ticket."
The problem is, there are some politicians who can afford a lot of lottery tickets...
no subject
Date: 2012-01-21 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-22 08:25 am (UTC)The buy-a-ticket lottery has this going for it; a lot of rich politicians attempting to buy the "election" might put in enough money to rescue social security.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-22 02:09 pm (UTC)Not that it will ever be enacted, or that there aren't a lot of problems with it, but I DO want something done about career politicians who are in it for the egoboo and personal power.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-22 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-22 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-23 07:45 am (UTC)Oh, you meant for the criminals.
Thats an interesting idea.
Date: 2012-01-21 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-24 08:53 am (UTC)I think it would be fascinating in a thought experiment way to take all the modern knowledge about power and ruling and try to think up a new system. And not Democracy 2.0 or New Republicanism or anything like that. You take the best from existing systems, fit in how people react and see what spits out the other end. The big issue there is that you can end up debating on what the 'best' of a system is. (ie: "X is best since it rewards personal effort", "No, It's bad because it has no provisions for social care")
From what I've seen, the real effectiveness of a political system is not the values of the ruling party, but rather the charisma and statesmanship of the person in the top job, who encourages buy-in from the people. Make people feel they are part of the leadership process and you get wonders done. Make people feel like they're just disposable cogs and you get Occupy movements.
Many political systems seen have relied on an educated few ruling an uneducated/disenfranchised majority. The world is in a situation where we are beginning to have an educated majority with access to real-time networking. I think it necessitates another look at how things are done. Just my two cents anyhow.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 11:20 am (UTC)