If you made them realistically smart militarily, they wouldn't have very many adventures and the show wouldn't have made it past the first season. Maybe not past the first couple episodes. Rule of Cool had to outdo rule of reality.
Not to mention putting the bridge of a starship on top of the hull where it is a huge target. All of Trek is/was never very good on combat and was always about appearances rather than suspending belief.
See, I was thinking, from a military point of view, Picard captured the right personality traits the best. Not having watched "Enterprise", to me, he's the one that's the most believable "Ship's Captain". Janeway is 2nd. While I liked Sisko, I didn't really think of him as a station commander at all.
I have to agree: James T. Kirk is the original and still the best. Janeway gets honorable mention as the only captain of a starship named "Enterprise" who didn't lose said ship while it was under her command.
That's Spock's job, not Kirk's. "According to sensors, Captain, the Enterprise is now in one million, two hundred seventy-one thousand, nine hundred twenty four pieces."
I don't remember the name of the Captain when Kirk was just a passenger and took the seat to rescue Guinan and the other refugees... you know, the movie where Picard and Kirk get together? He never lost his Enterprise, either - he just lost Kirk..
Like you, I have no idea if Archer lost his Enterprise. Anyone? (Don't make me Google it!)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But, Shatner's Kirk was the most entertaining.
no subject
no subject
Janeway gets honorable mention as the only captain of a starship named "Enterprise" who didn't lose said ship while it was under her command.
no subject
no subject
Did any of the Enterprise captains never lose their ship? Kirk lost several. Picard lost his. Sisko doesn't count. Who am I missing?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Like you, I have no idea if Archer lost his Enterprise. Anyone? (Don't make me Google it!)