seawasp: (Default)
[personal profile] seawasp
Which is better than the only practical alternative.

I did not vote for either one; I knew that New York would be going to Obama barring an act of God directly changing the minds of millions, so I took the opportunity to vote for a third party.

However.

In the next four years, we need to *MAKE* a third party, and WIN, and kick BOTH the Democrats AND Republicans out.

Because honestly? There's not really much difference between Obama and Mitt. The news and each groups' boosters like to talk up the differences like they're huge, insuperable gaps, but they're really both much closer to each other than either of them would have been to, say, Ronald Reagan or Richard Nixon, let alone Jimmy Carter or JFK. While Mitt and his party do seem more bound up with the obviously 1% interests, Obama's got plenty of support and interests in those areas as well; he just played the stage somewhat differently.

We need to BREAK the two party system. We need to SHATTER it. It needs to be turned into a system of PEOPLE, not organizations that perpetuate themselves as though the purpose of politics was to perpetuate politics.

Date: 2012-11-07 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] k-kinnison.livejournal.com
A third party wont work. because the current big two would be worried about losing votes to the third party. Four party system would work better.

Of course the current election system is completely geared towards a two party system. After Perot, the DNC and RNC just decided no one else could join them in the televised.

Barring Jesus coming again and running for president as a third party, it will never happen short of some sort of armed rebellion against the current government

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 6th, 2025 04:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios