seawasp: (Default)
[personal profile] seawasp
... but will people stop saying "semi-automatic" in a context that shows that they think it means "shoots like a machine gun"???? and misusing the term "ASSAULT WEAPON". Real assault weapons are NOT semi-auto.

A semi-automatic weapon is not a machine gun. It is not "made to kill a lot of people quickly", as one spam I got today says.

Most pistols are semi-automatic. You pull the trigger, it shoots, and a mechanism in the gun brings the next cartridge up so you can PULL THE TRIGGER AGAIN, having spat out the now-expended first cartridge's remains (the "brass").

Revolvers do the same thing through a different mechanism, but unlike a semi-automatic pistol, they don't eject the cartridges themselves, so you have to open the revolver up and clean it out and reload after 6 shots pretty much by hand, while you can eject a magazine from your semi-auto and keep shooting -- one shot at a time.

FULL AUTO weapons are the ones that shoot lots of bullets much faster than you can pull a trigger (well, faster than MOST people can pull a trigger; some of the stunt shooters can manage an impressive rate of fire for a short time). Real assault weapons are full-auto (many can SWITCH to burst and/or semiauto, but what makes them good military weapons is that they are in fact capable of fully automatic fire.

Semi-automatic covers most handguns and a fair number of rifles and some shotguns.

Fully-automatic weapons have been illegal in most states for YEARS, and generally HAVEN'T been used in the killings people get up in arms over.

Date: 2013-01-11 09:03 pm (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
I know some full-auto hobbyists. And got to go to a couple of the full-auto "shoots" that the Albany gun club does twice a year.

Somewhere on the net is a series of pictures of me firing a 20 mm anti-tank rifle (on a pedestal mount) at a plywood shilouette of a triceratops. Cost me $20 for the one round I fired.

Date: 2013-01-12 08:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com
As far as I know there haven't been any instances of firearms over 20mm being used in violent attacks. Logically we could open up the ownership of Impractically Huge Cannon considerably. Few people want to shoot irresponsibly at $20 a round, and anyone who can conceal an anti-tank rifle under their jacket is damn well welcome to do so.

Date: 2013-01-14 03:35 am (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
20mm Isn't that huge. The Lahti wasn't much bigger than a Barret .50 cal "sniper" rifle (the Barret is 5 feet long, That Lahti was a bit over 6).

Alas, I'm sure that if they had access under the same terms as regfular rifles, some nut case would set up someplace and start taking out cars & trucks on the freeway. *sigh*

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 07:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios