Today's irony...
Feb. 19th, 2013 06:37 am... the current panic over OMG GUNS! is driving vastly higher sales of guns and ammo. Nice Job Breaking It, Hero.
Not that anyone couldn't have predicted this, but I find it very amusing. Along with the idiotic locations doing "gun buyback" programs that don't come close to offering the actual value of the weapons, so that gun dealers and other private citizens show up outside the buyback area to acquire the guns at higher (but still very nice) prices. Everyone wins except, of course, the government that wanted to REDUCE the number of guns out there...
Really, sometimes I think that behind the scenes the NRA and other groups are grinning from ear to ear every time one of these happens.
Not that anyone couldn't have predicted this, but I find it very amusing. Along with the idiotic locations doing "gun buyback" programs that don't come close to offering the actual value of the weapons, so that gun dealers and other private citizens show up outside the buyback area to acquire the guns at higher (but still very nice) prices. Everyone wins except, of course, the government that wanted to REDUCE the number of guns out there...
Really, sometimes I think that behind the scenes the NRA and other groups are grinning from ear to ear every time one of these happens.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-19 01:09 pm (UTC)We're convinced that the NRA is now simply a mouthpiece for the ammunition industry (most gun manufacturers don't really like them, because they are bad for business).
no subject
Date: 2013-02-19 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-19 05:07 pm (UTC)Buy back programs work when you can't just go to the store afterward and buy the latest model; otherwise it risks turning into a "cash for clunkers" industry subsidy. That's the real problem, not the buy-back price. (Which isn't the replacement cost, no, but then again neither is the Blue Book value of your old Buick.)
-- Steve still can't make head-nor-tail out of American gun rhetoric. From the outside it looks like the Dancing Madnesses of Medieval Europe.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-19 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-28 06:35 am (UTC)As best as I can tell, the /short term/ history of the reasons dates back to around the Civil War.
Then there is the issue of how much is oral history. Both me and seawasp are Americans, but as we are from different parts of the country, we've naturally tended to pick up different oral history, and our family histories and traditions probably have some major differences. America is large, and there can be a huge 'blind men and the elephant' effect.
Money and political benefit are huge amplifiers. I'd expect a significant amount of information sources accessible overseas are originally intended for internal argument. Root causes and background are not the most useful things for this. Depending, one might either want to ignore them or take them for granted. As far as marketing internal policy to those outside the country, depending on the faction one might either be happy borrowing the rhetoric popular in those countries or ignoring the issue entirely.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-19 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-20 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 05:53 am (UTC)